Collaborative assessment workflow
CAMP is built for teams, letting you route domains to the people who own them and assemble one trustworthy picture.
Last updated June 1, 2026
A CAMP assessment is most accurate when the people closest to each capability answer for it. No single person knows the truth about identity, cloud, endpoints, and physical security all at once. Forest is built to spread that work across your team.
Route work to the right owners
The cleanest way to run an assessment is to assign domains to the people who own them. The cloud team answers Cloud Security. The identity team answers Identity & Access Management. Because each capability is scored the same way regardless of who completes it, the results stay consistent no matter how many contributors you have.
This division also surfaces honest answers. An owner is far more likely to record a No or Unknown accurately than someone guessing from the outside. For why those answers matter, see Why a No or Unknown affects maturity.
Keeping the picture coherent
As contributors complete their domains, the assessment assembles into one view. A security leader can see which domains are done, which are in progress, and where the weak spots are forming.
Completed domains produce trustworthy domain scores right away.
Open domains are visible as open, so nothing looks finished that is not.
Why this holds up
The Forest Intelligence Service is deterministic and explainable. Every score traces to the answers behind it, no matter who entered them. When a number gets questioned in a leadership review, you can point to the specific capability and the person who assessed it.
Treat the assessment as a shared record, not a one-time survey. Reassign and reassess as ownership and evidence change.
To speed up contributors who already track this data, see Importing assessment data.